ESG-reglering (miljö, socialt ansvar och bolagsstyrning) för kryptotillgångar syftar till att hantera deras miljöpåverkan (t.ex. energiintensiv mining), främja transparens och säkerställa etiska styrningsrutiner för att anpassa kryptobranschen till bredare hållbarhets- och samhällsmål. Dessa regleringar uppmuntrar efterlevnad av standarder som minskar risker och främjar förtroende för digitala tillgångar.
| Namn |
Coinmotion Ltd |
| Relevant identifierare för juridisk person |
2135881-0 |
| Namn på kryptotillgången |
Acala |
| Konsensusmekanism |
Acala operates as a parachain within the Polkadot ecosystem, leveraging Polkadot's shared security model. Acala utilizes collators to aggregate transactions and produce blocks, which are then validated by the Polkadot relay chain validators. |
| Incitamentsmekanismer och tillämpliga avgifter |
The native token of the Acala Network, ACA, serves multiple roles, including transaction fee payments, staking, and governance participation. ACA holders can stake their tokens to secure the network and earn rewards. |
| Periodens början |
2025-07-27 |
| Periodens slut |
2026-07-27 |
| Energiförbrukning |
52560.00000 (kWh/a) |
| Energiförbrukningsresurser och metoder |
For the calculation of energy consumptions, the so called 'bottom-up' approach is being used. The nodes are considered to be the central factor for the energy consumption of the network. These assumptions are made on the basis of empirical findings through the use of public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. The main determinants for estimating the hardware used within the network are the requirements for operating the client software. The energy consumption of the hardware devices was measured in certified test laboratories. Due to the structure of this network, it is not only the mainnet that is responsible for energy consumption. In order to calculate the structure adequately, a proportion of the energy consumption of the connected network, polkadot, must also be taken into account, because the connected network is also responsible for security. This proportion is determined on the basis of gas consumption. When calculating the energy consumption, we used - if available - the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) to determine all implementations of the asset of question in scope and we update the mappings regulary, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. The information regarding the hardware used and the number of participants in the network is based on assumptions that are verified with best effort using empirical data. In general, participants are assumed to be largely economically rational. As a precautionary principle, we make assumptions on the conservative side when in doubt, i.e. making higher estimates for the adverse impacts. |
| Förnybar energiförbrukning |
0% |
| Energiintensitet |
0 (kWh) |
| Scope 1 DLT växthusgasutsläpp - Kontrollerade |
0 (tCO2e/a) |
| Scope 2 DLT växthusgasutsläpp - Inköpta |
0 (tCO2e/a) |
| Växthusgasintensitet |
0 (kgCO2e) |
| Viktiga energikällor och metoder |
|
| Viktiga växthusgaskällor och metoder |
|