* Ei reaaliaikaiset tiedot.
* Mikään Euroopan unionin jäsenvaltion toimivaltainen viranomainen ei ole hyväksynyt tätä kryptovaran kuvausta. Kryptovaran tarjoaja on yksin vastuussa tämän kryptovaran kuvauksen sisällöstä.
Energiankulutus: 85935.60000 kWh/a | Uusiutuva energia: 0%
Kryptovarojen ESG-sääntelyllä (ympäristö, sosiaalinen vastuu ja hallintotapa) pyritään puuttumaan niiden ympäristövaikutuksiin (esim. energiaintensiivinen louhinta), edistämään läpinäkyvyyttä ja varmistamaan eettiset hallintokäytännöt, jotta kryptoteollisuus saadaan vastaamaan laajempia kestävyys- ja yhteiskunnallisia tavoitteita. Nämä säännökset kannustavat noudattamaan standardeja, jotka vähentävät riskejä ja lisäävät luottamusta digitaalisiin varoihin.
| Nimi | Coinmotion Ltd |
| Oikeushenkilötunnus | 2135881-0 |
| Kryptovaran nimi | Casper |
| Konsensusmekanismi | Casper employs a unique Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus protocol known as the Highway Protocol, which enhances security, flexibility, and finality. Core Components of Casper’s Consensus: 1. Highway Protocol (PoS): Flexible Finality: The Highway protocol allows validators to reach consensus on blocks at varying levels of confidence, providing adaptable finality options based on security needs. This flexibility enables the network to accommodate different transaction requirements and ensure robust security. 2. Validator Selection and Continuous Validation: Selection Based on Staked CSPR: Validators are chosen based on the amount of CSPR tokens they stake. The higher the stake, the greater the chance of being selected to validate blocks. Continuous Block Finalization: Unlike traditional PoS networks with fixed epochs, Casper’s Highway protocol allows for continuous block finalization, increasing network efficiency and reducing wait times for transactions. 3. Fork Choice Rule: GHOST Rule: Casper uses the Greedy Heaviest Observed Subtree (GHOST) rule to select the main chain. This rule prioritizes the chain with the most cumulative stake, minimizing forks and improving chain stability. |
| Kannustinmekanismit ja sovellettavat palkkiot | Casper’s incentive model supports validator and delegator participation through staking rewards, transaction fees, and a controlled inflation model to maintain network security and economic sustainability. Incentive Mechanisms: 1. Staking Rewards for Validators: CSPR Rewards for Validation: Validators earn CSPR token rewards for staking and actively participating in block validation. This financial incentive encourages validators to contribute to network security and reliability. 2. Transaction Fees: Fee Compensation for Validators: Users pay transaction fees in CSPR, which are distributed to validators. These fees provide additional compensation to validators, incentivizing efficient transaction processing. 3. Delegation Rewards for CSPR Holders: Broadening Participation through Delegation: CSPR holders who prefer not to run validator nodes can delegate their tokens to validators, earning a share of staking rewards. This broadens network participation and supports decentralized security. 4. Adaptive Inflation Model: Dynamic Adjustment of Token Supply: Casper’s inflation model adjusts staking rewards based on the total network stake. This adaptive approach helps balance token rewards with the network’s security needs, ensuring long-term economic sustainability. 5. Slashing Mechanism for Misbehavior: Penalties for Dishonesty: Validators who act dishonestly or fail to meet performance standards risk losing a portion of their staked CSPR. This slashing mechanism discourages misbehavior and ensures network reliability. Applicable Fees: • Transaction Fees in CSPR: Fees are paid in CSPR and distributed to validators, supporting their role in network maintenance and stability. |
| Raportointikauden alku | 2025-07-27 |
| Raportointikauden loppu | 2026-07-27 |
| Energiankulutus | 85935.60000 (kWh/a) |
| Energiankulutuksen resurssit ja menetelmät | For the calculation of energy consumptions, the so called 'bottom-up' approach is being used. The nodes are considered to be the central factor for the energy consumption of the network. These assumptions are made on the basis of empirical findings through the use of public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. The main determinants for estimating the hardware used within the network are the requirements for operating the client software. The energy consumption of the hardware devices was measured in certified test laboratories. When calculating the energy consumption, we used - if available - the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) to determine all implementations of the asset of question in scope and we update the mappings regulary, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. The information regarding the hardware used and the number of participants in the network is based on assumptions that are verified with best effort using empirical data. In general, participants are assumed to be largely economically rational. As a precautionary principle, we make assumptions on the conservative side when in doubt, i.e. making higher estimates for the adverse impacts. |
| Uusiutuvan energian kulutus | 0% |
| Energiaintensiteetti | 0 (kWh) |
| Scope 1 DLT KHK-päästöt - Hallinnoidut | 0 (tCO2e/a) |
| Scope 2 DLT KHK-päästöt - Ostetut | 0 (tCO2e/a) |
| KHK-intensiteetti | 0 (kgCO2e) |
| Keskeiset energialähteet ja menetelmät | |
| Keskeiset KHK-lähteet ja menetelmät |
Share on
