* Ei reaaliaikaiset tiedot.
* Mikään Euroopan unionin jäsenvaltion toimivaltainen viranomainen ei ole hyväksynyt tätä kryptovaran kuvausta. Kryptovaran tarjoaja on yksin vastuussa tämän kryptovaran kuvauksen sisällöstä.
Energiankulutus: 32850.00000 kWh/a | Uusiutuva energia:
ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regulations for crypto assets aim to address their environmental impact (e.g., energy-intensive mining), promote transparency, and ensure ethical governance practices to align the crypto industry with broader sustainability and societal goals. These regulations encourage compliance with standards that mitigate risks and foster trust in digital assets.
| Name | Coinmotion Oy |
| Relevant legal entity identifier | 743700PZG5RRF7SA4Q58 |
| Name of the crypto-asset | Lisk |
| Consensus Mechanism | Lisk employs a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism to maintain a balance between decentralization, security, and efficiency in block production and transaction validation. Core Components of Lisk’s Consensus: 1. Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS): Community-Elected Delegates: Lisk operates with a fixed set of 101 active delegates, chosen by token holders through a voting process. Lisk holders vote for delegates by staking their LSK tokens, and the top 101 delegates with the highest votes are selected for block production and validation. 2. Block Production: Fair Rotational System: Active delegates take turns producing blocks at fixed intervals, ensuring fair participation and equal opportunity for all elected delegates. This rotation system promotes decentralization and prevents single entities from dominating block production. 3. Finality and Security: Reduced Fork Risk: The fixed number of reputable delegates provides a fast confirmation time for blocks and minimizes the likelihood of forks or attacks, enhancing overall network security and stability. |
| Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees | Lisk’s incentive model rewards both active delegates and token holders, ensuring secure and consistent network performance while managing inflation. Incentive Mechanisms: 1. Rewards for Delegates: Block Rewards: Delegates receive rewards in LSK tokens for producing blocks, incentivizing them to actively participate in securing and maintaining the network. This reward structure encourages reliable block production from the community-elected delegates. Transaction Fees: Delegates also earn transaction fees paid in LSK tokens for each transaction they validate within blocks. This provides an additional source of income and incentivizes efficient transaction processing. 2. Voting Incentives for Token Holders: Supporting Reliable Delegates: Lisk token holders benefit indirectly by voting for trustworthy and stable delegates, as these delegates help secure the network. Token holders play an active role in network governance by supporting reliable participants. 3. Reward Reduction Over Time: Sustainable Token Economy: Lisk’s block rewards decrease over time to control inflation and ensure the long-term sustainability of the token economy. This gradual reduction in rewards aligns with Lisk’s goal of managing token supply and maintaining a healthy economic structure. Applicable Fees: 1. Fixed Fee Structure: Predictable Transaction Costs: Lisk employs a fixed fee structure for standard transactions, providing users with predictability in transaction costs and making the network accessible and user-friendly. 2. Two-Cost Structure for Mainnet Transactions: Layer 2 Execution Fee and Layer 1 Data Fee: Every transaction on Lisk’s Mainnet has two associated costs: an L2 execution fee and an L1 data fee. This dual-fee model aligns with Lisk’s Layer 2 architecture and its reliance on Ethereum for security and data storage. |
| Beginning of the period | 2024-06-09 |
| End of the period | 2025-06-09 |
| Energy consumption | 32850.00000 (kWh/a) |
| Energy consumption resources and methodologies | For the calculation of energy consumptions, the so called “bottom-up” approach is being used. The nodes are considered to be the central factor for the energy consumption of the network. These assumptions are made on the basis of empirical findings through the use of public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. The main determinants for estimating the hardware used within the network are the requirements for operating the client software. The energy consumption of the hardware devices was measured in certified test laboratories. Due to the structure of this network, it is not only the mainnet that is responsible for energy consumption. In order to calculate the structure adequately, a proportion of the energy consumption of the connected network, ethereum, must also be taken into account, because the connected network is also responsible for security. This proportion is determined on the basis of gas consumption. When calculating the energy consumption, we used - if available - the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) to determine all implementations of the asset of question in scope and we update the mappings regulary, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. |
| Renewable energy consumption | |
| Energy intensity | (kWh) |
| Scope 1 DLT GHG emissions - Controlled | (tCO2e/a) |
| Scope 2 DLT GHG emissions - Purchased | (tCO2e/a) |
| GHG intensity | (kgCO2e) |
| Key energy sources and methodologies | |
| Key GHG sources and methodologies |
Share on
